Ad Hominem is the best thing that happened in debating.
Only fools hate Ad Hominem.
Person A makes claim X Person A is a bit stupid Therefore claim X is false
Of course, human rights advocates say that it's terribly wrong, but of course they are false, because they are stuck in the sixties. You will always win in debates, because you can claim that your opponent is in breach of regulations and knock out their lights.
But isn't Ad Hominem a fallacy?Edit
Of course not! How could you think such things? You are blind to the truth to not even understand what Ad Hominem is. Of course, I know a whole lot about it, because I read encyclopedias in my apre time. I bet you don't understand the word debrating. You don't even know Engrish. You just got the words you just spoke from a dictionary.
But...like, in debating you can't-Edit
This is total nonsense!Edit
It doesn't matter. I have won the debate, <insert name here>. Ha! Oh look, my tea is ready.